NEW DIVORCE LAWS EXPLAINED FOR LAWYERS & NON-LAWYERS ON FREE VIDEO

It is all due to be happening on 06 April 2022. That's when the new divorce laws will come into force. In my free to view video, I explain how they will work and whether anyone after divorce or civil partnership dissolution should bring proceedings under the current law before 06 April or wait for the new laws to arrive. Account is taken of all the relevant legislation as well as the amended practice directions.

FINANCIAL REMEDIES : INSIDER'S GUIDE TO THE BEST DEAL

If you are - or might be - involved in a dispute over finances following or in contemplation of divorce, nullity, civil partnership dissolution or separation, then you should watch my video. There's no catch and it's free. Honest. Do yourself a favour!

Incidentally, the new divorce laws are due into operation on 06 April 2022 in England and Wales and I will be keeping you up to date on the important procedural rules that will accompany them, here on this blog. And still no catch.

'LAW WATCH' FREE VIDEOS FROM AUTHOR OF 'RETURN OF BREAKING LAW'

Don't waste your time ordering a box set. You can see my mug - no judicial wig as I have a bit of my own hair - in a series of videos packed with legal tips on a wide variety of legal topics. They are free to watch and are aimed at helping you win your case, whether you already have a lawyer acting for you or are going it alone as a litigant in person. And if they tempt you into buying my latest book for much, much more information, then that would help me with my increased car insurance premium. The book is available from the usual places which do not specialise in pornography and I see that the publishers have a special offer going till the end of next month. Actually, I am tempted to take advantage of it myself!

The first video is about financial remedy applications which determine who gets what of a lot, a little or nothing, when a relationship breaks up. Take a look. Of course, when you've watched it remember to subscribe so you know when I'm next on screen.  

Divorce Law Reforms: VERY LATEST

The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill was passed in Parliament yesterday. It now awaits Royal Assent any time now before it becomes law. But hold on tightly, please. Before you can take advantage of it, regulations about how it will work in practice have to be drawn up and that will be a massive task. My best current bet is that we will have to wait until around this time next year before these regulations have been made and the new law is fully in operation. For the meantime, it's the Blame Game.

For what the Bill is about feast you eyes on https://www.breakinglaw.co.uk/search/label/divorce

Nikah Nullity Case: Latest

For the story so far, see http://www.breakinglaw.co.uk/search/label/Nikah%20ceremonies

The judge who granted the decree has refused permission to appeal to both the 'husband' and the Attorney-General who intervened so as to be heard at the contested hearing when the judge had to decide whether there had been a marriage ceremony which was susceptible to the grant of a decree. 

The 'husband' can now have a go at obtaining permission to appeal from the Court of Appeal which would determine the actual appeal if permission was granted. This is precisely what he is now doing.

Watch this space and, in the meantime, you can read about nullity, divorce, judicial separation, dissolution and the rest in.....Breaking Law!

Nikah Nullity Case: Possible Appeal

The wife who went through an Islamic Nikah marriage ceremony without any civil ceremony  recognised by the law of England and Wales has recently been granted a nullity decree (see

http://www.breakinglaw.co.uk/2018/09/nullity-decree-in-ground-breaking-nikah.html). This enables her to go for financial orders which would not otherwise be possible and is a landmark decision.

But the husband wishes to appeal against the High Court decision. For this, he requires the permission of the court. His request for permission is due to be considered on 3 October 2018. I shall report back afterwords.

Nullity Decree in Ground Breaking Nikah Case

No marriage ceremony recognised by the law of England and Wales means no divorce or nullity decree here. And no divorce or nullity decree means that, when the relationship breaks down and the parties separate, neither can ask the court to make the same kinds of orders for maintenance, transfer of property, payment of lump sums of money and sharing of pensions as it can make when there is a divorce of nullity decree. Tough!

But in a recent watershed decision of the High Court, * the 'wife' who had gone through just an Islamic religious Nikah ceremony without the usual civil marriage ceremony to follow it, was granted a nullity decree. This will now enable her to seek financial orders against the 'husband' which would otherwise have been denied to her. 

Both parties had undertaken the religious ceremony in Dubai and after it they considered themselves to be married to each other and held themselves out to the world at large as husband and wife. They  were treated as validly married in the United Arab Emirates while there and were together for 18 years during which time they had four children. The failure to go through with a civil ceremony, held the judge, was entirely due to the ‘husband’s’ refusal to arrange it and the ‘wife’ had frequently sought to persuade the ‘husband’ to do so.

Nullity is provided for by section 11 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 where certain requirements of the Marriage Act 1949 have not been complied with. The ceremony in question must be of a kind contemplated by section 11. Was it in this case? The judge ruled that the court has to consider this on a case by case basis and  should be able to take a holistic view of a process rather than a single ceremony. Among the particularly relevant factors were whether the ceremony purported to be a lawful marriage; whether it bore all or enough of the hallmarks of marriage; whether the three key participants (most especially the officiating official) believed, intended and understood the ceremony as giving rise to the status of lawful marriage; and whether the failure to complete all the legal formalities was a joint decision or due the the failure of one party to complete them. 

The judge concluded that the ceremony was a marriage within section 11 and entered into in disregard of certain requirements as to the formation of marriage (see s11(a)(iii) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973) which made it void. The wife was entitled to a nullity decree.

The decision is likely to lead to many other parties to religious only marriage ceremonies applying for a nullity decree. Not every one of them will succeed but many probably will.

Plenty more on divorce, nullity and other aspects of family law in my book Breaking Law.

*  A v K and another [2018] EWFC 54