See my new shirt on my new video. What a treat. And there's some law too. A Court of Appeal decision on what was not - and what might be - unreasonable behaviour sufficient to lose you the costs protection which usually applies in county court small claims. How you might escape having to pay into a service charge reserve fund for your home. New rights for housing association tenants. And when you may be able to avoid disqualification for too much speeding. Just click below.
About this blog
Accessible legal tips, know-how and news for anyone with a complaint or legal issue from Stephen Gold, author of The Return of Breaking Law, the book
Sunday, 27 September 2026
Thursday, 11 September 2025
'LAW WATCH' VIDEO FOR SEPT/OCT: LATEST LAW
Enough sun. Catch up with legal developments in a relatively painless way with a click for my latest free video. Feast on
- saving on power of attorney registration fee
- earning £24 an hour as a litigant in person
- less info for the public at Companies House
- lower interest on personal injury special losses
- the sanctity of the financial dispute resolution appointment
- getting paid for caring for a relative
Saturday, 11 May 2024
LATEST 'LAW WATCH' VIDEO: KEEP ABREAST OF NEW LAWS
In this month's free video, I go through-
- The increases in court, tribunal and probate fees which bite as from 01 May 2024 - and what happened to the threatened divorce fee hike.
- Changes to debt relief orders next month (effective on 28 June 2024) - the panacea for the amateur debtor - which make it easier to qualify.
- Increases in personal injury damages following publication of new guidelines.
- Why judges' gowns are back at the Central Family Court.
- The new so-called compulsory mediation system for county court small claims cases which will lead to any party refusing to co-operate being sanctioned at the end of the case and having to lose or pay one-half of costs that would otherwise have applied - if not worse.
- And that Book!
Thursday, 21 December 2023
LATEST VIDEO: THOU SHALT MEDIATE - BUT WHEN?
The Court of Appeal has now ruled that parties to civil cases can be compelled to mediate. Just a click away and find out more PLUS the legal position on mediation in family proceedings and changes there in the pipeline.
Click below. It won't hurt.
Monday, 15 May 2023
VERY LATEST LAW ON VIDEO
It will just take you a click to keep up with what's happening in LawLand. Higher special damages interest in personal injury cases. Staying away on the hearing of small claims. And pre-nuptial agreements on marriage and civil partnership.
Wednesday, 26 October 2022
LATEST LAW IN 59 SECONDS (with a bit more 'cos I'm a lawyer)
Click on my video for the latest legal developments and tips. I promise it won't hurt.
Thursday, 16 June 2022
Monday, 29 July 2019
The Very Very Latest Court Procedure Rule Changes
Reviewing the situation The pre-action protocol for judicial review is amended - as from 17 September 2019 - to specify to where the letter before claim should be sent when the Treasury Solicitor acts for the intended defendant and has already been involved or where a decision of HM Revenue & Customs is involved.
Small but beautiful A hearing of a small claim (that usually means a claim that has been valued at £10,000 or less) will generally take place in public at a county court. That means that your arch enemies, next door neighbour, local newspaper reporter and former Latin teacher can all turn up and enjoy the proceedings. In practice, it is very rare indeed for anyone to be present apart from the judge, the parties, any legal representatives or McKenzie Friends and the witnesses, so don't worry. But just occasionally someone else might attend. Practice Direction 27 has been amended to clarify that the fact the parties agree the hearing should be in private will not of itself be a sufficient ground for the judge to direct a private hearing. The only situations in which a private hearing can be ordered are set out in rule 39.2 of the CPR. They include that publicity would defeat the object of the proceedings or that the hearing involves confidential information, including information relating to personal financial matters, and publicity would damage that confidentiality.
Monday, 14 January 2019
New CPR Updates: Boring
I told you! I told you!
Wednesday, 26 April 2017
Victory on Costs in Small Claims
Is there any exception to this protection from a costs bill? Yes. You won't enjoy the protection if you have been guilty of unreasonable conduct. You might have deceived the court and the claimant into believing that you were defending the claim and then deliberately stayed away from the final hearing. Or you might have brought a hopeless claim and lied your head off when you got to court with some of the biggest whoppers the judge had ever heard. Whether the conduct was or was not unreasonable is going to depend on the circumstances of each individual case.
But the Court of Appeal * has just endorsed some guidance on how the question of unreasonable conduct should be approached which will apply where you have attended the final hearing and not lied until your head dropped off. Conduct will not be unreasonable simply because you lose. And it will not be unreasonable if a more cautious litigant would have acted differently. The acid test is whether the conduct complained of can be reasonably explained. If it can, then your conduct (for example, in pursuing a failed claim or defence) might be regarded as optimistic but it will not be unreasonable. The Court of Appeal went on to express the view that it would be unfortunate if litigants were too easily deterred from bringing or defending a small claim by the risk of being held to have behaved unreasonably and so rendering themselves liable for heavy costs.
In the case in question, the claimant had failed in a claim because of an obscure point of law which had gone against him. He then appealed to a circuit judge and failed again but the circuit judge ordered him to pay the legal costs of the defendant which had been represented by lawyers, on the basis that he had been guilty of unreasonable conduct in pursuing the appeal. The Court of Appeal decided otherwise and quashed the order for costs. It was especially influenced by the fact that the circuit judge had actually given the claimant the necessary permission to make the appeal.
If you are making or pursuing a small claim and your opponent has lawyers, you may have heard from or you may be hearing from those lawyers to the effect that their client's legal costs amount to £40,000,000, accusing you of unreasonable conduct in the proceedings and threatening to ask the court to order you to pay those costs if, as they expect you do do, you lose. You might mention this latest Court of Appeal decision to them!
* The case name is Dammermann v Lanyon Bowdler LLP [2-17] EWCA Civ 269
.jpeg)

